Sylva staff enjoyed attending the Institute of Chartered Foresters’ national conference in Cardiff last week on the topic of land use and forestry.

Sylva CEO Gabriel Hemery gave a presentation to the 130 delegates on Future-proof woodland design and management, questioning recent ‘blind-alley’ policies and ‘lowest common denominators’ in decision making.  He offered ‘nativeness’ as an example of a lowest common denominator where woodland policies have often advocated only native and failed to support additional dimensions such as providing quality timber, being healthy, having genetic variation or even being future-proof.

just 2% of England’s land area is woodland in private ownership and managed according to known standards

Dr Hemery also graphically demonstrated the current ‘moribund’ state of England’s woodlands.  He asked all 130 delegates to stand and then explained that each person represented 1% of England’s land area (130,000 ha each).  Thanks to some cleverly distributed stickers, he then managed to get everyone except nine delegates to sit; those left standing represented the 9% woodland cover in England.  However, some harsh statistics were graphically demonstrated when he revealed that in fact more than half (627,000 ha) of the woodlands in England are not associated in anyway with the Forestry Commission (via grants and licensing etc) and therefore unquantified.  So, five people had to sit leaving just four.  These four people represented the 4% of land area in England that are woodlands managed to a known standard.  Dr Hemery then revealed that half of the known woodland resource (2%) was the public estate managed by the Forestry Commission.  After two more people  sat down, just two people in a room of 130 delegates were left standing.  This strongly illustrated the quite shocking statistic that just 2% of England’s land area is woodland in private ownership and managed according to known standards.

During the two day conference, many interesting ideas and information came forward from the presentations, question and answer sessions, and the main debate.  There were perhaps not many answers forthcoming but no-one present could claim to have a crystal ball when considering the future. The  Sylva Foundation will be producing proceedings for the conference, which will be available on our think-tank website:  www.ForestryHorizons.eu .

Share

Comments (0)

Institute of Chartered Foresters

We are pleased to be supporting the Institute of Chartered Foresters by co-sponsoring their national conference in Cardiff on 22/23 April 2009 on the topical subject of Landuse and forestry.

Share

Comments (0)

On 1st April, Sylva responded to an interesting article in the British newspaper, The Guardian, published on the 27th March.  Read our published letter here.  We covered the story itself in a recent post.

Our article prompted a lot of responses and they seem to suggest that forestry has a big job to do in promoting the good it does for both society and the environment.

A lot of comment seemed to focus on the fact the wood was clear felled, including:

  • It ought to have been “replanted” 40 years before it was cut down and part of it ought to have been left to die of old age.
  • You can’t call it sustainable by removing every single tree and then replanting, even if you stick twice as many trees in the ground as were standing before. Yes, the wood (and stored carbon) will return after a few decades, but what will the insects, birds, squirrels, fungi, shade loving plants, etc do in the meantime?
  • You can’t simply replace 100 years of growth, ecology, and wildlife all in 5 years! It is destroyed for another 100 years.

Continuous cover forest management would be one clear way to avoid public criticism, where selected trees would be removed and others would be left standing to create an uneven-aged structure.  However, this is a long task when starting with a single aged plantation.  The other problem of course is cost.

An interesting omission in all responses was any willingness to answer the question we posed in our article:

“Where do people think our wood comes from?”

We cannot pretend that forest management operations do not have an impact on the environment, on wildlife, and on the landscape.  At least we know that here in the UK we operate under the highest standards.  What about the 1 million tonnes of hardwoods we import every year into the UK.  Are they sourced under the same high standards?  What about the timber miles from importation?  What about the moribund condition of our woodlands because owners are disengaged with the need to manage, and the subsequent loss of woodland biodiversity?

Is the public response one of NIMBYism (Not In My Back Yard)?  Or is that people have never thought in any detail about where the wood, that every one seems to appreciate, comes from?

Share

Comments (0)
SYLVA

Charity registered in
England and Wales 1128516
and in Scotland SC041892

Company limited by guarantee 06589157

Copyright © 2009-12 Sylva Foundation. All rights reserved.

 
ABOUT SYLVA SYLVA PROJECTS SUPPORT US
Summary
History
People
News
Media
Contact Us
Treewatch
Forestry Horizons
myForest
OneOak
Donate
Volunteer
Shop

KEEP IN TOUCH
SYLVA facebook page SYLVA twitter SYLVA YouTube Subscribe to our mailing list SYLVA LinkedIn




Sylva Foundation, Manor House, Little Wittenham, Oxfordshire, OX14 4RA    Tel: 01865 408018